Case Study

To illustrate the benefits of public-private financing, the CAN DO Economic Development Department has prepared the following case study. Option 1 is conventional financing, while Option 2 includes public financing that results in substantial interest savings. Project: Construction of a 100,000-square-foot industrial flex building. About 50 jobs will be created to house a manufacturing business....

To illustrate the benefits of public-private financing, the CAN DO Economic Development Department has prepared the following case study. Option 1 is conventional financing, while Option 2 includes public financing that results in substantial interest savings.

Project: Construction of a 100,000-square-foot industrial flex building. About 50 jobs will be created to house a manufacturing business. The total project cost of $3,500,000 includes construction, design and administrative costs. The building is being constructed in a KOZ site.

Option 1 – Conventional Financing
Source Amount % Rate Term Monthly Payment Annual Payment Cost/ Square Foot
Bank $3,150,000 90% 7.25% 180 $28,755.18 $345,062.17 $3.45
Equity $ 350,000 10%  
Total $3,500,000 100%
Based on 5-year T-Bill Rate plus 300 bps; interest will change after five years.

 

Option 2 – Public Financed Project
Source Amount % Rate Term Monthly Payment Annual Payment Cost/ Square Foot
PIDA $1,400,000 40% 3.25% 180 $9,837.36 $118,048.35 $1.18
Bank $1,750,000 50% 7.25% 180 $15,975.10 $191,701.21 $1.92
Equity $350,000 10%  
Total $3,500,000     $25,812.46 $309,749.56
$3.10

 

Cost Savings Through Use of Option 2 – Public Financed Project
Monthly Cash Flow Savings
$2,942.72
Annual Cash Flow Savings
$35,312.61
Per Square Foot Savings
$0.35
   
Interest Paid from Conventional Financing (1)
$2,025,932.40
Interest Paid from Public Financing (2)
$1,496,242.80
Total Interest Savings Over Life of Loan
$529,689.60